On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 5:56 PM, David Gerard <dger...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6 August 2010 18:47, Michael Galvez <michae...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > 3. We acquire dictionaries on limited licenses from other parties. In > > general, while we can surface this content on our own sites (e.g., Google > > Translate, Google Dictionary, Google Translator Toolkit), we don't have > > permission to donate that data to other sites. > > > And the data that GTTK gathers from its use in Wikipedia translations? > What would need to happen for that to start coming back, in a usable > form? > The translated segments are available to all translators in Translator Toolkit. When other volunteers use Translator Toolkit to translate other Wikipedia articles, the segments will be available to them. > > > > Following interwiki links and suggesting parent categories is a bit of > work > > and unlikely to be implemented soon. We can disable category translation > if > > that helps - can you confirm if that's OK? > > > As I vaguely recall from someone posting study results on the > question, not all interwiki links are good, but ones that are a 1:1 > match generally seem to be. > > (I frequently use Wikipedia interwiki links as a guide to translating > single words casually.) > > > - d. > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l