Hi! > It's isn't my policy, it's our policy.
Who is 'we', whom do you represent? :-) > If you don't know to what I refer, then perhaps you can read up on it. You didn't tell what you represent and what policy you talk about, I don't know where to read about it. > As far as citing the archives of an email list, that is also not a citable > source. Thats very sad. I'm used to my mailing list posts being cited ;-) > If Foundation staff and supporters themselves, are *not prepared* to go on > the record with their claims, then why should anyone trust anything they say > on an email list? I cannot speak for Foundation at the moment, so I don't know why they don't go "on the record". I don't go "on the record" because I don't see any purpose, I already wrote in email what I thought I wanted to write. > That is the very nature of *false authority*, the bane of our project. What do you call 'our project'? I don't understand your affiliation. > I must say, I'm quite surprised that some people here don't grasp this > concept yet, > after the projects being in existence for so many years now, almost a > decade right? It is a fundamental principle, that we should be citing actual > authorities, not false claims to authority. I'm quite surprised you think I should care about whatever you want me to care because you want me to care about it. Cheers, Domas _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
