I am highly perplexed why we have a *public call for candidates* when the rest of the process remains so private.
Alex 2012/2/1 Chessie <derby_...@yahoo.com> > Finding people not well known to editors: great. > Finding people shy of 'grueling' public election process: ok... > > How does either lead to hiding candidate names? not doing background > checks? > > Not publishing what kinds of questions are asked? > > > As others said, this feels very strange. > > > On 2/1/12, Stuart West <stuw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The hope was to attract/identify Board candidates who could add a lot of > > value to the movement but who, for one reason or another, would NOT > > typically be candidates in election. That might be because they aren't > > well-known in the editing community that decides elections. Or as Thomas > > mentions that they wouldn't be interested in going through the sometimes > > grueling election process. > > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
