On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 18:33 -0600, Federico Mena Quintero wrote: > On Sat, 2007-12-15 at 15:06 +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> I just find it funny that this has been going on since September. > That's three months to write a few guidelines and give the OK to some > co-maintainers. > > So either the list of guidelines is horribly long, or the co-maintainers > are not doing their job. I'd like to know who they are, if you please, > so that I can help :) I think setting up a public mailing list like pgo-devel, just like most other GNOME projects have, could be part of the solution here. I don't think a public debate about pgo on our foundation mailing list is helping our community a lot right now. You want to attract people who are willing to constructively work with the maintainer on improving things into such debates. You want to ignore all other people. ps. I would also like to point out, Federico, that if you dislike how Jeff maintains pgo, that you can start a competitor right now. -- Philip Van Hoof, freelance software developer home: me at pvanhoof dot be gnome: pvanhoof at gnome dot org http://pvanhoof.be/blog http://codeminded.be _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list