On Dec 19, 2007 4:26 AM, Philip Van Hoof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 18:33 -0600, Federico Mena Quintero wrote: > > On Sat, 2007-12-15 at 15:06 +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote: > > > I just find it funny that this has been going on since September. > > That's three months to write a few guidelines and give the OK to some > > co-maintainers. > > > > So either the list of guidelines is horribly long, or the co-maintainers > > are not doing their job. I'd like to know who they are, if you please, > > so that I can help :) > > I think setting up a public mailing list like pgo-devel, just like most > other GNOME projects have, could be part of the solution here. I don't > think a public debate about pgo on our foundation mailing list is > helping our community a lot right now. > > You want to attract people who are willing to constructively work with > the maintainer on improving things into such debates. You want to ignore > all other people. > > > ps. I would also like to point out, Federico, that if you dislike how > Jeff maintains pgo, that you can start a competitor right now.
Phillip, You miss the point. The issue at hand is not "stealing PGO away from Jeff" but rather working with him to make it truly rock. Corey _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list