I see many people have expressed their consensus in this, thus I'll defer the decision to the Board. Thanks to anyone sending a mail about this concern.
cheers, Andrea 2012/10/4 Andrea Veri <a...@gnome.org>: > I've been a long time GIMPNET user and tried to propose multiple ideas > without success and without receiving a good rationale about why > things couldn't change. I've seen many people using home-hosted bots > to administer channels, I've seen people having to join #opers > multiple times to request an OP status or a simple channel update and > I feel it's time to find a solution. > > What's currently missing on the GIMPNET network: > > - services. (there's no nickserv, chanserv at all) > - TOR is banned. (there is no way to hide your hostmask if you run > your IRC client from your home connection) > - SSL is not enabled, so all conversations happen in plain text. (even > private ones, yeah) > - even having a bot administering a channel, setting up its access > list is hard with a dynamic IP and DNS. (you can use a wildcard, true, > but that will result in someone spoofing your identity if he just > wants to) > > So, the question is, should we migrate away to another network? (like > Freenode) or is there a way for GIMPNET to improve its services? _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list