On Thu, 2013-05-09 at 17:06 -0500, meg ford wrote: Hey Meg, > > On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Philip Van Hoof <pvanh...@gnome.org> > wrote: > On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 10:02 -0700, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote: > > > We are looking into changing our irc server name from > irc.gimpnet.org > > to irc.gnome.org and looking for feedback. > > Why? > > > Essentially, it's become problematic to have 'gimp' in the > name of our > > server. To many, 'gimp' is an offensive term an given our > dedication > > to a11y it seems counter-intuitive to have this name in our > > infrastructure. > > Yet another PCPOS in GNOME. When will this stop? Is there an > end? Any? > > > Yeah idk how "PC" it is to not use the term gimp. The US, where I > live, has pretty strong free speech laws, but people don't use this > term because it's too offensive. So I think this is kind of an I18n > issue. >
However, GNOME's origin is partly Gtk+ (which even predates and from where GLib came). Gtk+'s origin is Gimp's toolkit. Gimp was ~ GNOME's first and or one of its first projects and actually sort of predates GNOME as a sort of ancestor of the project and this community. What we're discussing here is that for PC reasons, GNOME wants to tell its father that it is no longer its father. I think that's crazy. I'd be completely ok with adding a irc.gnome.org and perhaps even changing the MOTD of the IRC server to mention less GIMP and more GNOME. That's natural as indeed GNOME today stands on its own feet. But why remove the GimpNET domain? You don't have to use it if you don't like the word Gimp. GNOME is a heavy user of Gtk+ which stands for Gimp Toolkit. With this latest line of PC thinking, shouldn't GNOME also stop using Gtk+? You know, because Gtk+ has an 'offensive' name in its acronym. I think you're all taking this way way too far and I think its becoming POS, whatever people like Karen think about Code of Conducts (that I actually have helped write - go look up in the mailing list from what discussion 'Assume people mean well' came from and who the actors in the formation of that part were). Kind regards, Philip > > The proposal is to make irc.gnome.org be an DNS A record and > we will > > continue to honor irc.gimpnet.org as a CNAME for one year in > which > > case we will then remove it altogether. > > > Gimpnet is cultural inheritance of GNOME, I think it's a bad > idea to do > this for that reason. > > Kind regards, > > Philip > > > -- > Philip Van Hoof > Software developer > Codeminded BVBA - http://codeminded.be > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-list mailing list > foundation-list@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list > > > _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
