On 05/21/2014 07:35 PM, Jeff Fortin wrote:
Le mardi 20 mai 2014 à 21:17 +0100, Ekaterina Gerasimova a écrit :
With regard to comments in this thread on candidates' time
involvement, and to Andreas Nilsson's earlier message on candidates
"falling behind" for not having answered the 130+ (!) messages posted
in the last day or two on this list: If I am to be judged on the speed
at which I can rapid-fire answers to a hundred-mails-long
multi-threaded mailing list topic, or by the clocked amount of hours
spent on something (vs work delivered/value brought to the table),
then I may look like the wrong candidate indeed.
It's mainly 6 messages, the rest are mostly made out of other candidates
answers and sometimes someone asking candidates to clarify their answers.
Since it is an election and there are several good candidates, I want to
cast my one vote on candidates that I know where they stand on these
questions. Opinions on issues such as Dave's what the candidates see in
a future ED, or Andy's if focus of the GNOME Foundation should be on
product vs. technologies greatly affects how the board will function and
vote.
I do actually keep a count on who replied to what thread, but I won't
vote on reply-ratio alone.
I wanted to avoid a situation where a candidate slips under the radar on
important matters and just get voted in on their name recognition in the
community alone. Fortunately a lot of candidates have been very good at
answering questions. Thank you everyone for taking the time to do that!
- Andreas
_______________________________________________
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list