On 7 August 2014 15:16, Máirín Duffy <du...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Hi, > > > On 08/07/2014 10:05 AM, Pascal Terjan wrote: >> >> I doesn't help. Do you think that because they could help this should >> be the permanent solution and there is no need to find a better one? >> Are you still using their hose? > > > Here is what I said in the email that you initially replied to: > > > "If there are financial concerns, let's continue to go through the actual > data and see if there is a way to solve them." > > I thought a house running from one neighbor's house to another was a clear > illustration of a *temporary* solution to help someone out before they were > solvent on their own. No, we are not still using the hose. We had to solve > the root problem of getting pipe repaired and securing the funds / > responsibility there before it could be disconnected though. How can you not > see how this relates? > > >> No one said we should drop it and ask that someone takes it over. >> It should be discussed with other participants and when a better >> solution is found it can be transitioned. > > > No one said that in as many words, no. But when it is essentially being said > that (1) it is able to operate at this time due to support from GNOME that > GNOME cannot afford AND (2) it should be split off from GNOME, then the end > result is splitting something off that cannot operate on its own. This is > equivalent to killing it unless I am missing something.
The possibilities I have seen discussed so far were: - Get more funding to be able to employ someone - Create a spearate fundation but that seems hard and could have more problems than GNOME currently has - Get things administrated by one of the other bigger participating organizations I haven't felt anyone wanted to get rid of it just to get rid of it _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
