Hi, On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 12:41 PM Tobias Mueller <mue...@cryptobitch.de> wrote:
> Hi, > > On Mon, 2019-05-27 at 07:48 -0500, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: > > On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 7:12 AM, Andrea Veri <a...@gnome.org> wrote: > > > I didn't express myself clearly enough: I really meant we haven't > > > received enough candidacies for the elections and the voting phase > > > to > > > begin, thus the need to extend the timelines. We currently collected > > > a > > > total of 5 candidates, 2 to go for the elections to actually start: > > > > This seems like case in point for why we should switch to two-year > > terms! Hopefully this will be the final election in which we elect > > seven directors all at the same time. > I think it's not a very good case for a longer term, though. > Just a few mails earlier we have seen an email in which a candidate > wondered whether they could make enough time available. > With a longer term that problem gets worse, not better. At one point the board discussed allowing candidates to run either for a two year or one year term. I think that would solve your issue: candidates who are working on projects that require more time can run for a two year term and those who are unable to make a long term commitment could run for a one year term. Meg > > > Cheers, > Tobi > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-list mailing list > foundation-list@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list >
_______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
