So far so good on the CER. [email protected]#sh bfd neighbors details Total Entries:1 R:RXRemote(Y:Yes/N:No)H:Hop(S:Single/M:Multi) NeighborAddress State Interface Holddown Interval R/H x.x.x.x UP eth 1/24 900000 300000 Y/S Registered Protocols(Protocol/VRFID): ospf/0 Local: Disc: 1, Diag: 0, Demand: 0 Poll: 0 MinTxInterval: 300000, MinRxInterval: 300000, Multiplier: 3 Remote: Disc: 24, Diag: 0, Demand: 0 Poll: 0 MinTxInterval: 300000, MinRxInterval: 300000, Multiplier: 3 Stats: RX: 769964 TX: 912706 SessionUpCount: 1 at SysUpTime: 2:14:7:51.198 Session Uptime: 2:14:5:36.63, LastSessionDownTimestamp: 0:0:0:0.0 Physical Port:TX: eth 1/24,RX: eth 1/24,Vlan Id: 4001 Using PBIF Assist: Y
[email protected]#sh ver System: NetIron CER (Serial #: xxxxxxx, Part #: 40-1000617-02) xxxxxxxx IronWare : Version 5.6.0bT183 Copyright (c) 1996-2013 Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. Compiled on Jan 19 2014 at 11:47:42 labeled as ce05600b Previously BFD flapped whenever rancid did a config copy. Since the upgrade a couple of days ago there has not been a single flap. Thanks Darren http://www.mellowd.co.uk/ccie Subject: Re: [f-nsp] IronWare version on XMR-4000 From: [email protected] Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 22:39:24 +0100 CC: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] To: [email protected] Hello Darren, Looking at 5.6 mainly for the exact same reason : BFD assisted hardware for CER. Is it a game changer ? Did you notice improvements ? Thanks. BR. Le 5 mars 2014 à 18:40, "Darren O'Connor" <[email protected]> a écrit : You don't need to be on the latest two versions. They are still releasing updated versions of 5.2 and so on. We are running 5.4E on our XMRs and 5.6B on the couple of CERs we have simply because of BFD hardware for CER in that code version Thanks Darren http://www.mellowd.co.uk/ccie > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 15:22:55 +0100 > CC: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [f-nsp] IronWare version on XMR-4000 > > Hello Stefan, > > Maybe you should explain which reasons makes you think you need to > upgrade ? If you have any specifics reasons, it may help to choose any > version. > > AFAIK, if you have support, you may need to be on the two last versions > (ie: 5.5 or 5.6), whith the highest level of patchs. Otherwises, in case > you'd neet to open a ticket, you'd only get "upgrade first, then we'll > have a look" from the TAC. > > I had no real issues on 5.5 versions. On 5.6, a few, but not anything > really disturbing (see my last post regarding 5.6 on that list). > > Regards, > > -- > Clément Cavadore > > On Tue, 2014-03-04 at 12:58 +0000, Stefan Larsson wrote: > > Hi networkers, > > > > I was merely wondering if anyone on the list could advice me as to what > > IronWare version one is recommended to run these days for production > > XMR-4000 routers running BGP? > > > > We are currently on 5.3.0T165 but looking to upgrade for several reasons. > > > > Thanks in advance for any and all pointers. > > > > - s > > _______________________________________________ > > foundry-nsp mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp > > > _______________________________________________ > foundry-nsp mailing list > [email protected] > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp _______________________________________________ foundry-nsp mailing list [email protected] http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
_______________________________________________ foundry-nsp mailing list [email protected] http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
