Hi, Interesting... Did TAC give you 56d GA release date ?
Y. > Le 25 mai 2014 à 12:57, Wouter de Jong <[email protected]> a écrit : > > Hi, > > (Apologies for not quoting, etc as I don't have the original email in my > mailbox) > > Too bad that 5.6 seems 'buggy' ... some of it's new features look nice, and > I was planning to put it on a new box... > now I'm not so sure about that any longer... > > > Also interesting that you seem to run 5.5d without problems, as we came > across a bug in 5.5 with regards > to the IPv6 route cache - DEFECT000500944 > > Due to it's characteristics, my guess would be that we really can't be the > only one that faced that problem ? :) > > The issue is that after a link between 2 MLXe's fails and the IGP selects a > different path ... it fails to update the IPv6 cache. > However, it updates the RIB, etc correctly .... so IPv6 traffic transiting > through the router appears to keep working without issue and > everything _seems_ correctly (even from looking at CAM), only traffic > originated from the router itself (eg. loopback) is still pointing > to the wrong interface, which for example affected IPv6 iBGP sessions in our > case. > > The provided method to resolve it is to manually clear the IPv6 cache by > running "clear ipv6 cache" > (Note that 'cache' is hidden in the outout from "clear ipv6 ?" ... > DEFECT000503937) > > > According to TAC, this issue occurs in both 5.5.x and 5.6.x ... and both > with IS-IS and OSPF. > In our case, this was on MLXe-4's with 4x10G X-blades, running IS-IS, with > v5.5d and v5.5e > Fix should come in 5.6d .. not sure in what version 5.5 will be fixed. > > > Just wondering if anyone else faced this as well ? > > > Best regards, > > Wouter > > _______________________________________________ > foundry-nsp mailing list > [email protected] > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp _______________________________________________ foundry-nsp mailing list [email protected] http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
