>> > I'm all for it. The question is: base or extra. Or even FCL. >> >> fpnet package. The FCL is only basic stuff, some extended RTL. IMHO the >> fpimage,db and xml shall also be moved to fpimage, fpdb and fpxml >> packages. > > Why prefix everything with fp ?
I think it will be more obvious as to why it is useful, when you start looking for DSO/DLL packages in the next compiler which has dynamic FPC packages working. i.e. on linux in /lib/ any DSO that starts with fp is easy to spot. If no FP prefix then RTL.so may conflict with many other DSO's out there. _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel