On Fri, 03 Feb 2006 19:01:53 -0700 L505 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > I'm all for it. The question is: base or extra. Or even FCL. > >> > >> fpnet package. The FCL is only basic stuff, some extended RTL. IMHO the > >> fpimage,db and xml shall also be moved to fpimage, fpdb and fpxml > >> packages. > > > > Why prefix everything with fp ? > > I think it will be more obvious as to why it is useful, when you start > looking for > DSO/DLL packages in the next compiler which has dynamic FPC packages working. > i.e. on > linux in /lib/ any DSO that starts with fp is easy to spot. If no FP prefix > then > RTL.so may conflict with many other DSO's out there.
Yes sorry, I was confusing directory names with shared library names. Micha _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
