On 4/9/06, Marco van de Voort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What? Do you mean that FPC implementation of generics wouldn't be > > based on "type erasure" but on beefed-up-precompiler-macros? Please > > say I got it all wrong :-o > > Do you have documents about "type erasure" in native languages where e.g. a > string is not an object ?
You have a point. But I don't think supporting generics for native types is a must-have. The syntatic sugar for having typesafe containers and algorithms for _objects_ is all I wanted ;-) Cheers, Flávio _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
