On 10/18/07, Inoussa OUEDRAOGO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > It is a strong point. > > > > On the other hard keeping the language clean is an important responsible > > task we have. We never planned to be compatible with Delphi.NET. (I have > > never considered Delphi.NET a real Pascal implementation; it departs > > rather far from what Wirth designed). While .NET features will spread to > > native code I'd like to consider native code features only. Some may > > originate from .NET in the end, and can be considered, but only because > > thy have become native Delphi features. > > I have a great respect toward FPC devel team. And I do > anderstand and respect that FPC team do not plan to be > compatible with Delphi.Net. > > But IMHO, if a new langage feature have to be introduced, > a feature already implemented in Delphi, it will be good > to make it compatible. Mainly for code sharing. > > -- > Inoussa O. >
I tend to agree, but Borland has neglected Delphi for so long that I really wonder if anything above Delphi7 (or even D5) is truly relevant... -Flávio
_______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
