> Datum: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 13:44:14 +0200 > Von: "Graeme Geldenhuys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > But what is fpdoc's xml files? Pure XML, XHTML or some custom/hybrid > format? The layout of fpdoc's files seem XML, but the documentation > content seems some hybrid HTML - hence the confusion with what is > allowed!
Well, what's the DTD saying about it? ;) > Anybody know the rules of strict XML files and Unicode? Can I use > Unicode characters as data in XML nodes? As long as the encoding doesn't say otherwise, yes. >I would imagine I may because > most well-formed XML files specify UTF-8 as the encoding type. Yes, you can. > Also something I think has been resolved in recent versions, but in > older 'makeskel' versions, it did not include the encoding in the > generated .xml file. So what are we supposed to treat such files > encoding as? Default to W3C standards and use assume UTF-8? Errmm, yes? > LCL and > fpGUI's fpdoc documentation (mostly) has no encoding specified in the > .xml files. FPC's documentation specifies ISO8859-1 as the encoding > type, though I found one file (dateutils.xml) it FPC docs that hasn't > got an encoding (but my doc update is out of date). Well, as long as the contents is English, it doesn't matter to much, UTF-8 is fully compatible to 7-bit ASCII. ;) If you're unsure about the encoding, stick to the � unicode entities, that way you can encode anything in 7-bit plain, portable ASCII. Vinzent. -- GMX startet ShortView.de. Hier findest Du Leute mit Deinen Interessen! Jetzt dabei sein: http://www.shortview.de/[EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel