On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 4:12 PM, "Vinzent Höfler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I suspect those entities get parsed by the DOM-unit as entities (which is the > right thing to do generally) and simply get lost in the transformation back > to the byte stream (aka. AnsiString) then. > >> … >> >> should be treated exactly the same as >> >> < or > or & >> >> when generating HTML output from fpdoc. > > Yes. But the latter have a character code below 256 (even below 128, so > they're plain 7-bit ASCII). >
I think you have a point with the DOM-unit parsing the documentation content. So we can safely say, the actual content is NOT copied as-is! … If the above was interpreted as-is (with the rest of the content), it would be 8 ascii characters all below 256 character code. No issues then! So yes I think I agree with you. Somewhere the above is being parsed, then found that as a whole it's above 256 ascii code and simply replaced with a ? character. I simply found this confusing, because Michael is very versed with fpdoc, and when he said the content (not the XML tags) is copied as-is, I would not have envisioned any issues with Unicode escaped character. Now we know better! :-) I'll file a bug report in Mantis. Regards, - Graeme - _______________________________________________ fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI toolkit http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/
_______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
