Marco van de Voort schrieb: > In our previous episode, Florian Klaempfl said: >>> theoretically be instantiated. On the other hand, I read that recently >>> the LCL was restructured a bit to improve the situation, so maybe the >>> results would be better now. >>> >>> Also note that WPO can do little about published methods (since it must >>> assume that these can all be called via RTTI). >> Maybe the IDE can feedback some info about used classes and methods? > > In time, a pascal analyser would be a good thing to have. I think analysis > of smartlinking is more something for an analyzer than the compiler itself > (though the compiler could generate certain datafiles obviously).
This won't help lazarus. For lazarus, also the contents of the lfms is important. _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
