2009/10/20 Alexander Klenin <kle...@gmail.com>:
>> As an alternative to the very limited "for-in", I have a better and
>> more flexible design, using the Iterator design pattern.
>
> for-in is just a syntax sugar plus standard interface for the cost common 
> usage
> of iterators. So they are not mutually exclusive at all.

Well, with for-in you can only loop through a list is a specific order
and direction. You can't peak forward, you can't move back, you can't
filter returned content.

So you, for-in is VERY LIMITED in my eyes, and a total waist of time.


-- 
Regards,
  - Graeme -


_______________________________________________
fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI toolkit
http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist  -  fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel

Reply via email to