Michael Van Canneyt schrieb: > > Secondly: > You promote a certain class/interface to a language feature. The > compiler then depends on the presence of a certain class with some > 'known' methods in the RTL. >
The whole interface ref. counting depends on that as well as e.g. the "as" operator. My opinion about the for-in loop: - I won't implement it - if somebody else implements it in a delphi compatible manner: fine - if somebody else implements it in a delphi compatible manner solving the flaws: great - if somebody else has ideas how the existing classes can be extended without drawbacks by more sophisticated iterators, go ahead, this won't interfere with Paul's stuff _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel