Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Ideally, the compiler has no knowledge at all of specific classes, and a
new keyword such as Iterator (or whatever) helps in ensuring that the compiler
is not contaminated with knowledge of specific classes or methods.
I'm not sure how things are helped by "slapping" a keyword onto it? If
we call the thing a "class" then it's evil, but if it's called an
"iterator" which is actually the exact same thing as a class, it's fine?
Correct me if wrong.
Micha
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
