On Tuesday 10 November 2009 19:08:45 Florian Klaempfl wrote: > Martin Schreiber schrieb: > > On Tuesday 10 November 2009 18:33:54 Florian Klaempfl wrote: > >>> Did you look into the code in cpstrnew branch? I did. > >> > >> And which changes are exactly the reason for your concerns? > > > > More checks > > Where? A pure unicodestring routine won't get additional checks. > > > and more complicated address calculation. > > Where? Adding 16 instead of 12 makes no difference. > > The "major" difference will be the initialization of the additional > fields and the increased memory requirement of 4 bytes per string. > I try to prove the exciting statement. How can I build a startup compiler for the cpstrnew branch or how to compile the cpstrnew branch?
Martin _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel