In our previous episode, Michael Schnell said: > On 01/26/2010 12:49 PM, Marco van de Voort wrote: > > > > Note that syncobjs is libc based (via cthreads basicevent*) on *nix, and > > wholly portable (also to windows). > > Ooops, that would mean I would not improve things when replacing direct > libc binding by syncobj binding ?
If you mean that it would still link to libc yes. > Many thanks for pointing this out ! > > What do you suggest for doing mutex and similar things ? 1) syncobjs 2) if it _has_ to be libc free, unit ipc 3) explain here why the above two are not good enough. _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
