On 26 Jan 2010, at 12:54, Michael Schnell wrote: > On 01/26/2010 12:49 PM, Marco van de Voort wrote: >> >> Note that syncobjs is libc based (via cthreads basicevent*) on *nix, and >> wholly portable (also to windows). > > Ooops, that would mean I would not improve things when replacing direct > libc binding by syncobj binding ?
I think that you are confusing two things: a) using the libc unit is always bad (except for keeping old Kylix code running on Linux/i386) b) the C *library* is perfectly fine to depend on for stuff like this Jonas_______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - [email protected] http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
