On Tue, 4 May 2010, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Florian Klaempfl het geskryf:
No. It actually proves that using 32 bit executables (and installer
packages!) on 64 bit linux is a pain. On windows, we can cover with two
installers Win2k (no idea about Win98) up to Win7 regardless if 32 or 64
bit, on linux things are much more compilcated.
I thought we were talking about FPC performance, not deployment. But while
you are at it. What if Linux versions of FPC simply used .tar.gz package
instead of RPM or DEB?
We offer a .tar.gz for download, so what is the problem ?
No-one is forced to use rpm or .deb files ?
Michael.
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
