On 2010-08-06 1:23 PM, Alexander Klenin wrote:
Correct.
I agree.
That is why reducing it to a required minimum is a good thing.
I agree with the idea.
But, not with the proposal.
Not the way it is made, anyway.
Why not come up with a small application/utility that caters for the
opposition?
IOW, write a small/simple utility that converts a given source to/from
those shorthand operators to/from their long form.
If there was such a thing and if it produced code that compiled to give
identical results, I would have no problems with the proposal.
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
