On 14 May 2011, at 00:06, Joerg Schuelke wrote:
> { definition contains the informations about a type }
> tdeftyp = (abstractdef,
> arraydef,recorddef,pointerdef,orddef,
>
> typName : array[tdeftyp] of string[12] = (
> 'abstractdef','arraydef','recorddef','pointerdef','orddef',
>
> The first are spread over the source and not well solvable by the
> use of macros. An include will do it better.
>
> The second ones and you can believe me there are a planty more of such
> examples, are easy solveable by macros. Moreover they are not even
> marked to be kept in sync in the compiler sources.
1) the compiler automatically makes you keep them in sync, because
adding/removing an element form the enumeration will cause a compilation error
for the array if it's not updated
2) the array can actually be removed at some time in the future, because FPC
can nowadays convert enumerations to their their name in string representation
(via str(), write() and writestr()). There are still some bugs in this
functionality in 2.4.x on some platforms though, so it can't be used yet in the
compiler
Jonas_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - [email protected]
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
