On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Jonas Maebe <jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.be> wrote: > > On 28 Jun 2011, at 14:58, Andrew Brunner wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 6:14 AM, Michael Schnell <mschn...@lumino.de> >> wrote: >> >>> For variables not defined as volatile, (e.g.) pthread_mutex (and similar >>> stuff on Windows) can be used to protect them. >>> >> A mutex may be able to atomically block access because of its own >> memory barrier, but I would suggest that employing such a technique on >> multi-core systems will not ensure an accurate value. > > pthread_mutex() does guarantee that. I don't know about the Windows > equivalents. >
Specification just describes standard mutex. What makes pthreads specification different to include ordering? _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
