On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 04:22, Florian Klämpfl <flor...@freepascal.org> wrote: > > Why? 2) is exactly the same? The const contract with the compiler is broken.
Since when are passing by value and by reference the same? > Besides this, people like Martin Schreiber won't be happy if a procedure > suddently eats hundreds of extra clock cycles for nothing. For those people, I proposed to add optimization switch to the "UNCERTAIN" group. I just do not think it should be on by default. Also, can you Cc him -- maybe we should ask him directly? -- Alexander S. Klenin _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
