On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Marco van de Voort <mar...@stack.nl> wrote: >> Is this possible in UNIX? I can see that in Windows you can use the >> trick to use W versions which are identical except for the string type >> and drop Windows 9x support, but is this really possible for the UNIX >> syscalls? They expect UTF-8 not UTF-16 which is what UnicodeString >> uses. > > Afaik QT and many other higher level libs always use UTF-16. MSE does too. > Might > also be useful for the JVM port.
I think I wasn't clear enough. I wanted to say that I don't see how you can have both a Ansi and a UTF-16 RTL in UNIXes with the same codebase, without ifdefs. I think this is not possible and one of the previous messages seamed to indicate that the RTL would be able to use the same codebase regardless of the output version (ansi vs utf-16), so without ifdefs. > But it will be beneficial to everybody, and it is clear to everybody how > something should behave, so there will be no endless bickering over details > and workarounds like this thread. It is a structured approach. Well, there is still uncertainty over the question brought up by Graeme: Always UTF-16 or the unknown string type? > BTW: I explained all this to you, including the not dropping legacy, over some > Chinese food a few months ago. Don't you remember? Yes, I remember, but the way you spoke about it, it sounded something like a proposal, not 100% sure it would end up like this =) Now it is really put as the way forward... -- Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
