Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Marco van de Voort wrote:
Question if I may: should I be avoiding symlinks as non-portable?
For anything that should go back into SVN: no symlinks (*).
(and in general, even without SVN concerns, I don't think heavy
symlinking
is a good concept in sources. This would cause only problems because sb
might modify it for ppc, and not notice mips also linked to the file)
(*)http://subversion.apache.org/faq.html#symlinks
Thanks, noted. Obviously while I've just got a local copy on my system I
can easily locate symlinks, SVN is very much in the future since I've
got limited confidence in my work so far.
I'm trying to put some more time into this. I've got to the point where
building the RTL complains with 'Selected assembler reader not
supported' which I suspect is because there isn't an racpugas.pas unit
in the compiler. Could somebody please kick me ASAP if this isn't the case.
As a general question (or possibly this is a feature request), should
fpc -i report the available assembler formats? How about also the svn
revision number if available?
--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk
[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
