On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 18:46:29 +0100 Hans-Peter Diettrich <drdiettri...@aol.com> wrote:
> Mattias Gaertner schrieb: > > > I guess most people would say that "good multi language Unicode support > > in FPC" requires a Unicode supporting RTL. > > Please clarify: *Unicode* or UTF-16 support? > > Unicode is covered by both UTF-8 and UTF-16, so it's not really > important which encoding is used in the supporting procedures. I know. I'm only saying that for most people an utf-8 and/or utf-16 string type is not enough. For example common file function currently support only 8-bit windows codepage. Users expect to handle files x-platform without using external libraries like LazUtils. Mattias _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
