On Tue, 25 Dec 2012 18:01:50 +0100
Florian Klaempfl <flor...@freepascal.org> wrote:

> Am 25.12.2012 15:28, schrieb Mattias Gaertner:
> > On Tue, 25 Dec 2012 12:55:41 +0100 (CET)
> > mar...@stack.nl (Marco van de Voort) wrote:
> >
> >> [...]
> >> The numbers Martin names (up till 10 times slower, even without linking) 
> >> are
> >> the numbers I have in mind too. IMHO denial without tests is unfair.
> >
> > Maybe the parallelization could be improved?
> 
> Yes, this might be a good solution for the future but last time this 
> topic came up, Martin still wanted to run FPC on some almost 10 years 
> old machine so parallelization does not help. Another thing would be an 
> fpc compiler daemon which stays in memory between compilations and keeps 
> also ppus loaded.

Do you mean as separate process?

Mattias
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist  -  fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel

Reply via email to