On 06/21/2013 09:54 AM, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
Again I'd assume that the memory allocation for the result is the most expensive operation with UnicodeString operands, independent from string lengths.
Do you suggest that with UnicodeString - even when using 1 Byte encoding types such as ANSIxxx or UTF-8 -, the memory allocation is more expensive than with the older String handling implementation ?
Why ? In fact, the additional some 8 bytes for the Code-Element-Length and Code-Type definition (additional to the already existing String-Length, Content-Address and Ref-Count DWords) should not matter at all.
-Michael _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
