On 06/26/2013 06:19 PM, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
A string variable has no encoding type stored. Only non-empty strings
have an encoding.
Sorry for bad wording. Not the String variable itself (as same is just a
pointer to the String Record) but the string Record it points to has the
field for storing the dynamic encoding type. The string variable of
course only has it's static encoding type at compile time.
Nonetheless you need to know that a string variable with one (normal)
encoding type that points to a String Record that holds a different
encoding type should never happen and might trigger unpredictable behavior.
No string can have an encoding of $FFFF.
Why then is same defined as a constant ?
I assume that when creating a RawByteString variable and not assigning a
normal string to same, it will point to a a string Record holding an
encoding Type $FFFF, but I might be wrong regarding this implementation
detail.
You might use DXE and test
var s;: RawByteString.
..
setlength(s, 10); //force allocation if a String record.
...
This only gets interesting when using RawByteString not in the way we
discussed right now but according to what the name suggests - but this
is jet another issue.
-Michael
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
