Den wrote:
Please excuse the fact that I have reordered the message to conform to
the bottom-posting convention of this mailing list.
On 14-01-22 12:35 PM, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
Am 22.01.2014 19:31, schrieb Den:
haha, well Sven, if some of my patches were to get accepted *cough*
What patches? Are they available somewhere?
> Yep!
>
> $INCLUDESTRINGFILE -- http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=25536
> Apache24 Patch -- http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=25534
> EGL/OpenGLES20 Split -- http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=25535
>
> Although I have an updated version of the Apache24 which supports
> Config Options better and a few more macros.
>
> I also have a small fix for 'WinSock2' inclusion which makes it actually
> get included in the Win32/Win64 FPMake (looks like it was planned but
> never added).
I think there's a big difference between adding or enhancing packages
and tinkering with the core language. I suspect that your
$INCLUDESTRINGFILE won't get accepted since it's considered too "Perl
like", but here would be a good place to give some usage examples and to
argue its merits.
--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk
[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
