On 01 Feb 2014, at 22:47, Sven Barth wrote: > On 01.02.2014 22:37, Ewald wrote: >>> >>>> It indeed looks unproblematic. That is basically the reason I ask. >>> >>> The only recent problem I know of with darwin/x86-64 was introduced in >>> r26519 and was fixed in 26618. >> >> >> Hmmm. Then the possibilities are: >> - Something wrong with certain utilities? (like ar, ....?) >> - Wrong starting compiler? (although unlikely, since the makefile would >> complain. I use 2.6.2) > > Could you please try a compiler from revision r26223 (the first one of which > you said compiles again) whereby you *revert* the changes done in r26222 (the > revision has x86_64 related changes, so this *could* be the problem) and > report back your findings?
Here you go: r26221 with the changes from r26223 compiles and runs fine. So it appears that r26222 is the culprit. -- Ewald _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - [email protected] http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
