On 02 Feb 2014, at 11:59, Sven Barth wrote: > So... does that mean that one shouldn't use "exit" inside a constructor for > the 2.6.x series?
Not in combination with regvars. Note that this combination is not guaranteed to go wrong (in fact, it's quite unlikely), it just can go wrong. > If so then we should put up a warning somewhere... Then we should also warn not to use peephole optimizations on i386 in 2.6.x (http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=23431 ), and probably about many more things. I don't mind version-specific "FPC known issues" pages on the wiki, but I don't feel like creating and maintaining them myself. Jonas _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - [email protected] http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
