Michael Schnell schrieb:
I fear that there will be code that relies on the "flawed" behavior of RawByteString ("it's a feature, not a bug") and using the same name with different behavior would brake same. And a really usable DynmicString would not adhere to that description.
How can somebody "rely" on behaviour *stated* as undefined, or not working as defined?
DoDi _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
