>>> 1. Sounds like fpmake doesn't recursively add dependencies? e.g.
rtl-objpas should come as dep of fcl-base.
>>> 2. if the patch just adds ALL those dependencies to all those
packages, are they really tested as being really required for all of those?
I knew that I should be more verbose in my original e-mail - my apologies...
No, there was no need to add ALL dependencies - *rtl-objpas, rtl-extras,
rtl-console and fcl-base* to ALL fpmake instances:
M ide/fpmake.pp
M utils/fpdoc/fpmake.pp
M utils/fpmake.pp
M utils/fppkg/fpmake.pp
M utils/pas2jni/fpmake.pp
M utils/pas2ut/fpmake.pp
M utils/unicode/fpmake.pp
I was adding dependencies one by one - after compilation error about
unresolved used "unit" I was looking for the package that contains this
unit and adding the missing dependency - for every compilation error and
for every fpmake instance.
But all these added dependencies were from this list...
It is not a big deal, though it took several iterations.
What I really want to understand (or get some opinion) - why linux_x64
build did not have these issues
BTW - one of the missing units was variants (from rtl-objpas)
And you were already fixing similar issue in different fpmake.pp -
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=26630
>>> Fixed by adding rtl-objpas to dependencies.
>>> Don't understand though why this doesn't lead to problems under
supported (2.6.4) circumstances.
>>> Variants usage is in fpjson from the beginning since rev r85xx
So the mystery continuous :)
Thanks,
Gennady
PS. I probalbly should have compare build logs between linux_x86 and
linux_x64...
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
