>>> 1. Sounds like fpmake doesn't recursively add dependencies? e.g.
rtl-objpas should come as dep of fcl-base.
I am not familar at all with fpmake design - if "fcl-base" depends on
"rtl-objpas" - does it mean that "rtl-objpas" dependency is exported -
i.e. -Fu to "rtl-objpas" will be added if only "fcl-base" dependency is
added in fpmake.pp?
I had to add dependency to rtl-objpas in several fpmake instances - even
though fcl-base was already there :(
On 12/28/2014 5:49 PM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Joost van der Sluis said:
What I do not understand is the following - why these missing
dependencies were not required for linux_x64?
What I do not understand is why you needed theses changes in the first
place? Can you send the commands you used to compile fpc, and the last
part of the output?
PS. I can submit changes (i guess?) or send a patch file if somebody
needs it.
No, you do not have enough permissions to commit. But can you send the
patch, so that I can see what you've changed?
In addition my observations:
1. Sounds like fpmake doesn't recursively add dependencies? e.g. rtl-objpas
should come as dep of fcl-base.
2. if the patch just adds ALL those dependencies to all those packages, are
they really tested as being really required for all of those?
E.g. I can't imagine rtl-console be needed for so many of them.
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
