On Sun, Jun 9, 2019 at 10:00 PM Dmitry Boyarintsev < skalogryz.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Should the flowing code (inside of DoSomething body) be ok as well? > ((^Integer)(b))^ := a^; > I mean, like *many, many, many *things, yes it is technically possible for that to be valid Pascal syntax. As far as *should*, well, I'm not personally a fan of that sort of too-many-parentheses typecasting, but I wouldn't specifically care one way or another if it was added as there's no reason for me to. I fail to see how that is anything more than *distantly *related to what we're discussing in this thread, though. In general I'm not really interested in playing this sort of FUD-ish *"if we add X, it's gonna lead down the road to Largely Unrelated Y!" * back-and-forth game, as I find it both childish and a waste of time as it's almost always highly unrealistic with regards to whatever is being talked about.
_______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
