doesn't it make sense to also include subarchs in xtensa-freertos?
diff --git a/utils/fpcm/fpcmake.ini b/utils/fpcm/fpcmake.ini
index 16396ca921..9151c09021 100644
--- a/utils/fpcm/fpcmake.ini
+++ b/utils/fpcm/fpcmake.ini
@@ -295,6 +295,13 @@ endif
override FPCOPT+=-Cp$(SUBARCH)
endif
+ifeq ($(FULL_TARGET),xtensa-freertos)
+ifeq ($(SUBARCH),)
+$(error When compiling for xtensa-freertos, a sub-architecture (e.g.
SUBARCH=lx106 or SUBARCH=lx6) must be defined)
+endif
+override FPCOPT+=-Cp$(SUBARCH)
+endif
+
Am 19.04.20 um 13:23 schrieb Florian Klämpfl:
Am 01.04.20 um 18:58 schrieb Christo Crause via fpc-devel:
I directly edited the makefile to demonstrate the principle. In
addition to a change to makefile.fpc an update to fpcmake.ini is also
required, see attached fpcmake.patch
I committed the SUBARCH changes.
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
