On Fri, 17 Apr 2026, Marco van de Voort via fpc-devel wrote:
Op 17-4-2026 om 11:57 schreef Michael Van Canneyt:
It does: By better structuring - for example forcing the use of a MR -
we can assign a milestone when accepting MR's and we'll have an exact
list of MRs to go to fixes as well as devel.
/So much/ administrative overhead. And then we still have to find out if
that concept works at all in the FPC context.
There is no administrative overhead. I'mm not proposing to work with epics,
stories and whatnot.
No: You create a branch, develop your thing, and push. That's it.
Press a button to merge.
The difference with before: we have a good record that's easier to handle.
And if we find it really does not work, we switch back. It's that simple.
I would be against that.
No surprise there.
We see the world very differently. As far as I am concerned, the change to
gitlab has only been for the good. The number of merged merge requests is a
testimony to that.
Your last words in your mail clearly indicate you have a different view of that.
Probably a matter of glass half full/half empty.
Michael.
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - [email protected]
https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
