2010/10/21 Adem <listmem...@letterboxes.org>: > On 2010-10-21 23:47, Florian Klämpfl wrote: > > This is wrong. If a big change promises significant advantages for FPC > users, it will be done. > > The qualifier 'significant' (above and below) is far too subjective > sometimes to even have a hope of arriving at a common ground. > > But, I'll take my chaces and point at DoDi's alternative parsers proposal. > > To me, it does sound like quite a significant advantage.
Oh wow, so you want to change the parser because it "sounds" nice to you? Seriously, if this work was done more co-operatively with the fpc team, it may have made it. But I think it is too ambitious in the first place. Some people maintain patch quilts for ages before it makes it into the kernel, for example. Henry _______________________________________________ fpc-other maillist - fpc-other@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-other
