On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Lukas Gebauer wrote:
> > And the other way around. The main problem with Borland is that it only > > supports one and a half platform on one processor. > > Sure, but Borland is home for Synapse. > > I create Synapse primary for my programs. I am professional > programmer and I create lot of commercial programs by my Synapse. > This is reason why Borland is very important for me. Programming is > not only compiler, but IDE too! I not see comparable IDE for FPC with > Borlands IDE. ;-( > See http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/ The IDE is VERY good. The editor is smarter than Borlands. The form designer is getting closer every day, but it is very usable. > FPC is only new playground for me now. Until FPC have comparable GUI > based IDE with Borland's IDE, then I cannot use FPC for hard > developing. ;-( See above. Michael. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal