On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:36:58 +0200 (W. Europe Daylight Time) Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Lukas Gebauer wrote: > > > > And the other way around. The main problem with Borland is that it > > > only supports one and a half platform on one processor. > > > > Sure, but Borland is home for Synapse. > > > > I create Synapse primary for my programs. I am professional > > programmer and I create lot of commercial programs by my Synapse. > > This is reason why Borland is very important for me. Programming is > > not only compiler, but IDE too! I not see comparable IDE for FPC with > > Borlands IDE. ;-( > > > > See > > http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/ > > The IDE is VERY good. The editor is smarter than Borlands. > The form designer is getting closer every day, but it is very usable. :) The IDE does only work under Linux, Free-, Net-, OpenBSD. Win32 support is progressing and any helping hand is welcome. > > FPC is only new playground for me now. Until FPC have comparable GUI > > based IDE with Borland's IDE, then I cannot use FPC for hard > > developing. ;-( > > See above. > > Michael. Mattias _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
