Vinzent Höfler wrote: > Currently all I see is a subtle semantic difference between Windows- and > Unix-Event's implementation.
AFAICS, it's as close as it can get. You mean subtle as in, unimportant, or as in, possibly fatal ? :-) If possibly fatal, describe when/how. > So for now all I can say is that this should either > > a) be documented, *Could* be a good idea, yes ;-). > b) changed to a common semantic behaviour, or They're both more or less 'transient' now. I am not sure how to emulate windows behavior on unix, although that behavior is easier to use I think, so would be desirable. Micha _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
