> On Tue, 1 Jul 2008, Florian Klaempfl wrote: > > > I read most of the discussion and I think there is no way around a > > string type containing an encoding field. > > [cut] > > > I know this approach contains some hacks and requires some work but I > > think this is the only way to solve things for once and ever. > > I think it is the most promising and extensible proposal, > so I'm all for it.
I read it shortly, and I still don't like it. I need more time to prepare a reponse though. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal